Testing is the process used to identify the defects and improve the quality, functionality and performance of the product or system. It helps find out the issues before they become converted as major problems. Majorly there are two types of testing methods practiced in the industry. One is traditional testing methods and the other is Agile testing.
In early days testing was performed as late-stage activity that performed only at end of the development cycle, this has some limitations indelible to changing requirements and may not include all the errors.
Agile testing has come to address these limitations to meet the requirements of the rapidly evolving development landscape. In this article explores the key differences between Agile and Traditional Testing, the benefits of Agile Testing, and why businesses are increasingly favoring Agile vs. Waterfall Testing.
Understanding Traditional testing:
Traditional testing is a structured, sequential approach to ensure product quality assurance. This testing method is performed after the development process over with a predefined set of phases. This approach is characterized as Manual testing, where humans execute test cases without the use of any automation tools.
Key characteristics of Traditional Testing:
- Sequential and Phased: Follows a step-by-step process where phase wise completion.
- Separate Testing phase: Testing happens only after the development is complete.
- Documentation: Relies on heavy and detailed documentations.
- Manual Execution: Testing is mostly performed manually by dedicated members.
- Defect Detection: The main goal is to identify and document as many defects
- Less Agility and Flexible: Linear approach, less adaptation to changes. It takes time.
Some of Traditional Testing Approaches:
- Waterfall Model: A step-by-step sequential project or product development process. One must be completed before the next begins.
- Unit Testing: Test individual components of the software system separately.
- User Acceptance Testing (UAT): Testing conducted by end-users to check if software meets their needs before deployment.
- Black-Box Testing: Testing without looking at the internal code, focusing on inputs and outputs.
- White-Box Testing: Tests internal code and logic. To check code quality and find hidden bugs.
- Regression Testing: The process of re-running tests after any changes in code ensures new modifications do not affect functionality.
Understanding Agile testing:
Agile Testing is a continuous process where testing is conducted throughout the development life cycle on a going basis, just opposite of the traditional method. The main goal of this testing is to early fault or error detection, ongoing improvement. This integrates Testers with the development team to ensure the product meets customer expectations.
Simplaixis’s PMI-ACP Certification teaches agile methodologies like agile principles, Scrum, Kanban, Lean, and best practices.
Some of Agile testing Methods:
Test-Driven Development (TDD): Developers write test cases before writing actual code. This ensures that code meets requirements from the start.
Acceptance Test-Driven Development (ATDD): Tests run based on user expectations. Make testing matching with real-world usage.
Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD): Write test cases in simple, plain language that describe how the software should behave, so everyone understands what’s expected.
Continuous Integration and Continuous Testing (CI/CD): Developers add code continuously into Pipeline and automation tests run every time to catch the problems early and keep software running.
Exploratory Testing: Testers use the software freely and creatively without script to fund the bugs that planned test cases might miss.
Agile Testing vs. Traditional Testing: A Key Differences Table
Aspect | Agile Testing | Traditional Testing |
Focus | Continuous improvement and quick delivery | Comprehensive test coverage before release |
Development Model | Iterative (Agile, Scrum, Kanban) | Sequential (Waterfall) |
Test Plan | Adaptable and evolving | Structured and less flexible |
Testing phase | Continuous, throughout developement | After development is complete |
Documentation | Lightweight, adaptive | Extensive, detailed |
Customer Involvement | Continuous and High | Limited, mostly at end |
Flexibility | Highly flexible to changes | Low, difficult to accommodate changes |
Time management | It takes less time because testing is done when the development starts | It takes more time because it tests when development ends. |
Automation | High, Test automation integral | Low, mostly manual |
Feedback cycle | Short, rapid feedback | Long, Feedback at end |
Release Strategy | Frequent releases with working software | Single, Major release after comprehensive testing |
Team Collaboration | High team collaboration, cross-functional teams | Low, More distinct roles and communication channels |
Risk Management | Risk-based, early detection | Late, after major development |
Simpilaxis’s CSD certification course is the best choice for professionals looking to gain hands-on expertise in Agile testing practices.
Benefits of Agile Testing Over Traditional Approaches
- Faster Time-to-Market: Parallel development and testing make product release faster keeping pace with what business needs.
- Higher Quality: Testing early and most of the time helps find problems sooner making it easier and cheaper to fix them.
- Improved Collaboration: Agile breaks down barriers between teams, encouraging teamwork and every team member takes responsibility for quality.
- Greater Flexibility: Agile processes accommodate changing requirements, ensuring the product remains relevant and valuable.
- Less Risk: Ongoing feedback and testing based on risk help us sport and solve issues before they become serious.
Read Also:Why is Agile methodology is better than waterfall?
Agile vs Traditional Testing: Where Each Works Best
Agile testing is ideal for Projects where requirements are likely to change frequently, such as Software development, mobile app development or web applications, these areas require rapid feedback and iterative development. This testing method allows for quick adjustments and fine-tuning as the project progresses, reduces costs and expedites the release processes.
The Traditional Testing method is more suitable for projects which need extensive testing validation. A project has a clear framework for testing activities, detailed documentation of test plans, has separate development and testing teams which have distinct roles and responsibilities can opt for this methodology. The final delivery will not happen until the error or defects are fixed, ensuring a high-level of quality is achieved. Particularly this testing method suits in scenarios where changes are minimal.
Conclusion:
According to a Delta Matrix study, organizations that scaled Agile testing witnessed a 25% productivity boost, because of rapid decision-making, autonomy, and transparent processes. This testing method delivers faster, higher quality and better collaboration compared to traditional methods. Want to shine in Agile testing methods? Enroll in Simpliaxis’s industry leading course DevOps foundation to learn CI/CD & automated testing. Upskills your testing skills; start your Agile career path now.